AO Assessment — 5 dimensions
Deliver · Demand · Capacity · Capability · Organization. Map systemic bottlenecks before proposing anything.
A 150-person program. Velocity tracked, ceremonies clean, backlogs tidy — and yet deliveries slip, dependencies pile up, decisions go untraceable. The team wasn't the problem. The system was. A working session on diagnosing what frameworks can't see — and acting without breaking what works.
That's the question I've been chasing for years — and by transformation I mean all of them: agile, digital, restructuring, M&A, AI. We can blame developers or blame management, but does that solve the problem? No. It just moves the conversation away from the system.
So I built a collaborative working session. Dense, but the centre of gravity is collaboration, not slides. We use tools, surface patterns, and leave with recommendations you can act on the same week.
It exists in two forms — a tight 90-minute live version for conferences, and a longer 4 × 2h online cohort when reflection deserves more room.
Which one fits your context? Tell me below — I'll be in touch when the next date lands.
A large modernization program. 150+ people. "Agile" teams on paper. Velocity measured. Ceremonies clean. Backlogs tidy. And yet — deliveries slip, dependencies multiply, no one can name who is actually making the decisions.
The real issue: the organizational structure was never redesigned. Scrum was grafted onto an org chart built for stability. The system resists — not by ill will, but by design.
How do we diagnose what agile frameworks can't see — and act without breaking what's working?
No silver bullets. A coherent set of tools that, used together, surface what dashboards and ceremonies politely hide.
Deliver · Demand · Capacity · Capability · Organization. Map systemic bottlenecks before proposing anything.
Applied to decision and authority flows — not just product flows. Where does ownership actually live?
Move the conversation from "team underperformance" to "poor system design." Same data, different verdict.
Structural POCs tested before any redesign — small, time-boxed, reversible. Evidence over slides.
A framework for spotting the regulatory loops that are missing, broken, or routinely bypassed — the structural cause of most "people problems."
The point of a REX is honesty. The room has likely seen the same patterns — naming them is half the work.
Concrete artefacts — applicable the week after.
The 5 dimensions of Agile — applicable next week to pinpoint the real issues in your own context.
How to distinguish agile processes from organizational design — and why confusing them is expensive.
How to propose and timebox structural experiments without triggering political resistance.
The room is probably feeling the same things. On-the-ground difficulties aren't failure — they're systemic signals to be interpreted.
Twenty years inside transformations that worked and transformations that didn't. The slides came after the scars.
Multilingual organizational designer and executive coach, based in Uster (Zurich). Worked across SAP-scale enterprise programs, Swiss finance, public sector and Erasmus+ contexts. Founder of the AO Method — Agile Organization — a working framework for adaptive design grounded in systems thinking, VSM and viable feedback loops.
What I bring to a room: honest diagnosis, no framework worship, and a stubborn focus on what will actually change Monday morning.
Pierre doesn't sell a framework — he hands you a working diagnosis. Two days later, my leadership team was finally arguing about the right thing: the structure, not the people.Head of Transformation · European bank
Tell me which format fits you best. I'll be in touch when the next conference date or online cohort is scheduled. No newsletter, no spam — one email when something concrete is on the calendar.
Prefer email? Write to pierre.neis@menschgeist.com.
Conference keynote, in-house leadership session, or a closed-door coach circle — the workshop adapts to the room.